Tesco Management Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 4750 words

Tesco Management - Case Study Example The company is a new entrant in the American market and has only about 53 stores all of them located in USA. Any organization irrespective of size or motive (profit or not-for-profit), whether it is publicly owned or not will be affected by many factors and influences. These might be external and internal. This paper is divided into two parts and the first one will analyse the external and internal influences on TESCO. The second part of the paper will discuss the topic of globalization with reference to the above mentioned company. In the process it will take the following three issues into consideration. It will analyse how globalisation influences policies and decision making in TESCO. It will then critically evaluate the effectiveness of the organisation's response to those issues and finally provide some areas for improvement in the response of the organisation. The paper will begin with a short history and development of the company. As with most organisations TESCO started off as a single grocery stall in 1919. The shop was started by Jack Cohen who named the shop TESCO in 1924. The inspiration behind the name was a tea supplier called T E Stockwell. Cohen used the T E and S, the first three letters of the name and CO to form the word. The company began to grow rapidly and soon had a headquarters in North London in the year 1932 and also became a private limited company in the same year. The company went public in the year 1947. Expansion continued mainly though acquisitions of other stores. The company also began building superstores and also entered the retail petrol sale in UK. The current name of TESCO Plc was taken in 1983. The company's first overseas expansion was in 1995 to Hungary. The Company entered the Asian market two years later. Its internet portal and shopping facility TESCO.com is launched in 2000. TESCO entered the highly competitive market in the year 2007 only. Internal influences: The internal factors are those which can be controlled to a large extent by the company management and staff. Internal influences include, the management strategy, the human resources of the company, the marketing strategy, the level of technology, the organisational culture etc. Management strategy: The overall strategy formulated and practiced by the management will have a great influence on the company. If the policies are not properly taken, it will have a negative influence and correct ones will have a positive influence. It is also said that implementation of the strategy is more important than the strategy itself. "A study of 275 portfolio managers reported that the ability to execute strategy was more important than the quality of the strategy itself." (Kaplan and Norton 2001, p.1). The management strategy of TESCO can be easily understood and reviewed from what the company calls its steering wheel. The basic vision of the company with regard to customer service is the words 'every little helps' that appears in most of the company's pages. Their strategy is classified into five sections namely customer, community, operations, people and finance. Customer strategy includes great service by the staff, eliminating the need for queuing, providing a wide variety of goods that customers can get his needs under one roof, offer the lowest possible prices and obtain lifelong customer

Why Pit bulls should not be banned Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Why Pit bulls should not be banned - Essay Example The controversy surrounding particular breed of pit bulls is hidden from nobody these days. It is believed that the controversial rumors intended to attach a horrendous and notorious reputation to these dogs are specially appreciated by those who do not own one of these themselves. In contrast, the proponents of pit bull bans argue that dog bite epidemic has become a recognized problem in the US lately and it is high time now that weight actions at superior level be made to pin down the reports of pit bulls killing and maiming people. Facts and discussion presented in this essay are meant to illuminate the reality of the claim that â€Å"pit bulls should not be banned rather efforts should be directed at educating the dog owners and people and passing the strictest criminal and dog control laws.† There is an increasing need to acknowledge the fact that on grounds of only a few nasty and sorry incidents, not all pit bulls should be banned because unreasonable aggression is not a part of their nature and they tend to attack only under certain stressful or perilous circumstances. Not just pit bull but any other dog also would feel compelled to attack upon being annoyed by owners or other people who are not properly educated about a certain breed’s specifics which implies that people are to be blamed for the pit bull bite problem and not the entire breed itself. The idea of banning pit bulls should be condemned by everyone as one argument against implementation of breed specific laws reasonably suggests that â€Å"banning a breed is like human racial discrimination† (Phillips). ... roponents of pit bull bans claim that not only pit bulls but all closely related breeds should be banned which reflects a severe violation of animal rights because if it is really desired to put an end to the dog bite issues in the US, then those criminal minded dog owners should be apprehended and interrogated who subject the pit bulls to insanely hard to believe cruel and atrocious treatment as a way of making them violently dangerous. Why pit bulls are judged in such a negative and biased manner and arguments are made to ban them when they are not the culprits in the first place but innocent victims of severe abuse and cruelty? The proponents of pit bull bans should actually question their own flawed argument to â€Å"ban pit bulls and their closely related breeds† (Phillips). Another popular argument enthusiastically spread by the proponents of pit bull bans is related to the extreme danger associated with pit bulls because apparently this danger is so well established tha t these dogs are held responsible for about â€Å"75% of all reported canine-inflicted human deaths in the past two decades† (Phillips). What is sad is that the large group of advocates openly supporting the breed bans also includes some respected figures like Ingrid Newkirk whose opinions are trusted and considered valid. But the important thing is not to blindly believe someone else’s beliefs but to responsibly take up an issue to explore it in an impartial manner and reach decisions as objectively as possible. Considering the long history of cruel treatment of pit bulls at hands of the inhuman owners, the banning argument loses its validity along with the claim that pit bulls and other closely related breeds account for majority of all canine-inflicted deaths reported in the US. This is because